Topic on Talk:Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver

This is a permanent link to a single version of this post. This version is from 19 February. You can see the differences from the previous version, or view other versions on the post history page.

You provided lie again in the article for SR1 (I am about these your words - "By express request of the mod's creator, Wrace, PCGamingWiki is, for reasons known only to Wrace"; the reasons known for anyone who read this board - I will repeat them again below), used some trick to keep the info about my mod and still kept the lie about my mod. Moreover, I - author of the mod (info of which is provided in this article) - can't edit this article (:facepalm:), so just remove any mention about this mod completely as I requested originally.

BTW: I obtained the info from moderator about my ban on one month here and the reasons of it. I quote it below.

Offense: Edit warring, harassing users, vandalism

Diff:

   https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/Topic:Xuf8gfl7k4jeh4gf
   https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Blood_Omen%3A_Legacy_of_Kain&type=revision&diff=1440518&oldid=1440025
   https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Blood_Omen%3A_Legacy_of_Kain&type=revision&diff=1439646&oldid=1405931
   https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Legacy_of_Kain%3A_Soul_Reaver_2&type=revision&diff=1440514&oldid=1439787
   https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Legacy_of_Kain%3A_Soul_Reaver_2&type=revision&diff=1439639&oldid=1433242
   https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Legacy_of_Kain%3A_Blood_Omen_2&type=revision&diff=1410063&oldid=1405581

The simple and evident question: where exactly did you see the "harassing users" and "vandalism"? :facepalm:

That's why I provided such my condition above (true reason of my deny to PROVIDE ANY INFO about my mods here which is KNOWN for anyone who read this board): "Oh, yeah. I want to see the apologies of moderators for the improper actions of one of them (who provided the ban for me here) with the firing of this moderator and with the permanent ban here for the "if and while". Otherwise I deny to share my mods here (especially because I did not provide my permission for sharing bink patch on the Nexus Mods - it is the direct violation of legal rights of owner)."

You did not fulfill it and I provided my deny as I promised. Very simple.

P.S. it seems that you do not understand that your pathetic tricks (which looks very clever for yourself and your minions) will not work at all. Just because I can just add the protection I mentioned above at the next release (with really big improvements) of my mod which will be described in the appropriate Steam by the words below. "Limitation: the game MUST be run from the Steam interface. It is protection against thieves (gog, PCGamingWiki, so on) and piracy." So your words "for reasons known only to Wrace" on the page of the game on PCGamingWiki will look very funny for the most of users. :facepalm:

P.P.S.: if you want to keep the info about both existance of Enhanced Improvement and deny of the author of the mod on providing any info about it (them) on PCGamingWiki, I can allow you to do this. In such way: 1) remove any mention about all products with my code from the appropriate articles on PCGamingWiki as I requested; 2) in the appropriate section (about Enhanced Improvements) add such text: "There is another ("only one really working and good" - this text (with parentheses) should be added in the article for SR1 only) Enhanced Improvement which can't be mentioned in this article due to deny of its author by such reason (it is own opinion of this one) - inadequate behavior of moderators and users here. You can take this Enhanced Improvement by yourself in the top Steam Guide ("with the big amount of likes and awards" - this text (with parentheses) should be added in the article for SR1 only) for this game." It will be the real truth and fulfilling of your desires. :tongue:

P.P.P.S: I just remembered that you, perhaps, can't understand by yourself the difference between providing the direct link on the product, forming the search request and the way I suggested in the PPS, so let I spend some amount of my time to explain the difference between them. 1) In the first two cases - when you provide the direct name of enhancement - you can still keep the lie / desinformation about it (the block of the code about reverting changes in the article of SR1 and in this article too; though I saw only one for all time (about 10 years) who asked about this; moreover, I know about existance of several texture's mods for this game which are very popular among fans; in addition to this, there was another (very popular) Steam Guide with the modification of texture of Raziel and there are exactly 0 complaints about it; so providing such info in the article of SR1 is the deliberately misleading users using opinion of just one strange fan) while you can't do this in the last case (when you did not provide the direct name of enhancement, name of its creator and any additional info about it). In the last case users will obtain only the info that I - creator of the mod - provide about it. If one does not like something, I can listen this one opinion and provide either explanation for this one or the appropriate fix in my mod. While now - in the article of SR1 - the opinion of just one user is imposed on others. Also as other users can provide their own edits of the artcles though both them and even moderators know NOTHING about the work of the game itself and about work of mod. Just because they did not create their own improvements for this game. 2) The words about just using the top Steam Guide will teach users where they need exactly find the really working solutions (not on PCGamingWiki, just on the places where games are actually sold and where there is some kind of real tech support for really playing users - not just opinions of ones who do not play in games really). 3) Forming the search request (instead of providing direct link or info about top Steam guide) is the direct and explicit encouraging piracy = violation of legal rights of creators of products. x) It is very strange that you kept the info about Soul Enhancer (my product) in the article for SR2 though someone moved info about it at the end of this article (from the section of Enhanced Improvements, far away from Soul Fixer, author of which can't provide requested by the users fix (I am about fixing the bug with the movement when one uses Mouse+Keyboard controls scheme - the existance of this bug was confirmed by the author of Soul Fixer - you can easily find the appropriate info on the site of this one - but this one can't resolve it though this bug was resolved by myself in 2008 and was just the part of our localization from that time) which was provided by myself in the standalone mod though I provided to the author of Soul Fixer the appropriate code for this fix (to do not share my own mod at all), but this one rejected my help at all) and your moderators confirmed this action (yep, they kept very strange and really unneeded advice about activating of full version of starting dialog with settings which can solve NOTHING, but they confirmed moving in the strange place the mod which fulfill desires of fans which (desires) were provided in the big amount of Steam Reviews for SR2 - you can easily check this moment (complaints on back tracking, impossibility to skip ingame movies, unworking Invincibility feature in the PC-version of the game though it is official feature of PS2-version of SR2) by yourself). With the correction I provided in the PPS you will need to move the info about this mod back into the correct section.