Anonymous edits have been disabled on the wiki. If you want to contribute please login or create an account.

Warning for game developers: PCGamingWiki staff members will only ever reach out to you using the official press@pcgamingwiki.com mail address.
Be aware of scammers claiming to be representatives or affiliates of PCGamingWiki who promise a PCGW page for a game key.

Topic on User talk:Jigen123

This is a permanent link to the first version of this post. You can view later versions on the post history page.

I'd rather not create a Discord just for this. Guilt tripping people saying "I have seen A LOT of questionable edits from you" doesn't help people learn - you saying be more careful before that was enough. If not malicious intended, I don't want to know what you think is malicious.

For the reasons you left for the edits:

- I would appreciate what about my grammatical fixes were incorrect, or if 'grammar' is the incorrect term for the editing notes. The grammatical editing section of the guide doesn't answer all questions for it.

- Telling me "Key points are deprecated, do not add new ones" after saying "Instead of making intros" (which isn't correct as it was part of the initial release section, hence the time frame and critical consensus) "that are copy-pasted from Wikipedia, try to incorporate key points information in them" doesn't help when you just said they're deprecated. If key points are deprecated, then why do pages still have them?

And the points I wanted to dispute and explain for:

- For games that support different VRAM amounts, the page automatically adds "of VRAM," so with the method you lay out the figures, it says as an example "1 GB (Nvidia) of VRAM." I don't believe this fits well as a regular page with one amount of VRAM reads "1 GB of VRAM," which is the reasoning for me moving the brand name to the beginning.

- A company going out of the business isn't out of the scope of the website when the critical consensus was it was rushed, felt incomplete, and stretched for time.