Warhammer 40k base games and expansions/standalones

Jump to: navigation, search

If the fixes are pretty much identical, it's probably better to merge them into a single page (with the links to expansions/standalones going to the main article).

You could then split up the savegame table into one row for each expansion for example.

We should include a good availability table to explain the difference between the expansion packs, and what the best version to buy is (gold for example).

Andytzer - oppa18:31, 4 January 2013

Indeed, there's still an awful lot of work to be done. Sadly, Dawn of War doesn't lend itself to being combined (so many different versions and mods for each one...). I plan to put more into it when I can. It seems redundant, but for example Soulstorm is definately deserving of its own article to highlight the amount of high quality modifications there are.

No doubt I need to think more on this and if they could be combined, how.

Also, its my pleasure. You did a great job on that KOTORII article on RPS, and I honestly didn't want to leave you to suffer alone! I'll tackle Dawn of War 1 for the moment, then perhaps when I have time I will ensure I put together a proper article for Dawn of War II.

Hirmetrium (talk)18:37, 4 January 2013

Thanks for all the work on it :). I'll leave you to it as I haven't had the pleasure of playing it yet. But I do intend to - and it would be great to have written somewhere on the base game page an evaluation of the different exps/standalones - as some people often go for standalone to save money, even if it's a mistake. For example, Titan Quest should be skipped in favour of Immortal Throne as it improves the base game tremendously, and is compatible with the fan patch.

Andytzer - oppa18:44, 4 January 2013