Thread history
Viewing a history listing
| Time | User | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18:23, 5 February 2013 | Andytizer (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Humble Bundle not Indie) |
| 14:54, 4 February 2013 | Jmaa (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Humble Bundle not Indie) |
| 05:08, 4 February 2013 | Cheeseness (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Humble Bundle not Indie) |
| 17:18, 3 February 2013 | Andytizer (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Humble Bundle not Indie) |
| 16:52, 3 February 2013 | Soeb (Talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Humble Bundle not Indie) |
| 15:56, 3 February 2013 | Jmaa (Talk | contribs) | New thread created |
I feel that the name of the page should be Humble Bundle, now that they are doing stuff like THQ-bundle and stuff.
Not that big of a issue.
I don't see the point of moving this page just because they did one non-indie bundle, especially it's hard to define indie. Shank was published by EA, Bastion by Warner and there were other cases, so in reality it'd be best for it to stay this way for now.
This is something to consider in the future, and will depend on the future that the Humble Bundles take. Happy for it to stay as it is for the time being.
I'm not too fussed with the page title, but for the sake of clarity, it's worth mentioning that according to the Humble Bundle guys, there have been 13 "non-Indie" bundles (Frozenbyte Bundle, Voxatron Debut, Android bundle, Music bundle, eBook bundle, etc., none of which they count as "Humble Indie Bundles").
There's some discussion regarding including "Indie" on the Wikipedia talk page as well.
And they (Wikipedia) have even changed it to "Humble Bundle". Also, I went searching: http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=Humble%20Indie%20Bundle%2C%20Humble%20Bundle&cmpt=q
The page clearly says that "Humble Bundle" is 10 times as popular as "Humble indie bundle". And as Cheeseness points out, there is lots of non-indie bundles.
